Selected Questions- Answers From All Experts Astronomy Forum (Estimating No. of Stars In An 8000 Light Year 'Bubble' Around Earth) - Hallo friendsUPDATE NEWS AND HOT, In the article you read this time with the title Selected Questions- Answers From All Experts Astronomy Forum (Estimating No. of Stars In An 8000 Light Year 'Bubble' Around Earth), We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article ECONOMY, Article GENERAL, Article LATEST, Article POLITICAL, Article TIPS, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Selected Questions- Answers From All Experts Astronomy Forum (Estimating No. of Stars In An 8000 Light Year 'Bubble' Around Earth)
link : Selected Questions- Answers From All Experts Astronomy Forum (Estimating No. of Stars In An 8000 Light Year 'Bubble' Around Earth)

Selected Questions- Answers From All Experts Astronomy Forum (Estimating No. of Stars In An 8000 Light Year 'Bubble' Around Earth)

Question: How many stars would be in an 8000 light year ''bubble'' around Earth? And how many habitable planets would said area have?

Answer:  First, let's change the units to parsecs instead of light years. Currently, the stellar density near the galactic center is estimated at 100 per cubic parsec - so that in the Earth's vicinity two-thirds of the way out to the galactic edge it is  much more sparse,  like 0.5 per cubic parsec.

Converting light years (radius = 4000 ly) to parsecs we get a radius R = 1.23 x 10³ parsecs.


We use this to get the  total volume of interest:

V = 4/3 pi R ³  =  7.8 x 10⁹ cubic parsecs


If there are 0.5 stars on average per cubic parsec then the stellar density is:

(0.5) (7.8 x 10⁹ cubic parsecs)  =  3.9 x 10 ⁹ (approx.)

(This would be the same number as in your "8000 light year ''bubble'' around Earth")

The next question (how many habitable worlds?)  is much more difficult because the data is extremely sketchy.  Assuming a habitable planet requires an early spectral type G star (the Sun is G2) then perhaps only 1 out of 100 stars fit that bill. "Habitable" means within the so-called "Goldilocks" zone - i.e. within a suitable temperature sphere about the star.

So far only about 1 in 100 fit that distribution according to a sampling of the Kepler space telescope exoplanet findings.

So, given these limiting parameters (fractions), the estimated (again 'ball park') number of habitable planets in that volume (not "area")  would be: roughly    40,000

One must take care, however, to distinguish "habitable" from actually inhabited. The latter, may be one thousand times less - again, or only 40.   In the words of Guillermo Torres, an astronomers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics:

"These planets do exist. We didn't know that before. What we're really looking for eventually is signs of life. We're not there yet. It will take many years."

Indeed! Which begs the question: 'Can any kind of life on these exo-planets really be determined from a distance?'  I don't believe so.  I suspect it would take actually going there and doing a=careful bio-chemical investigations such as we've done on Mars.  So the most we can do for now is speculate that this or that planet may be life supporting, or potentially "habitable".

Thus Article Selected Questions- Answers From All Experts Astronomy Forum (Estimating No. of Stars In An 8000 Light Year 'Bubble' Around Earth)

That's an article Selected Questions- Answers From All Experts Astronomy Forum (Estimating No. of Stars In An 8000 Light Year 'Bubble' Around Earth) This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Selected Questions- Answers From All Experts Astronomy Forum (Estimating No. of Stars In An 8000 Light Year 'Bubble' Around Earth) with the link address https://updated-1news.blogspot.com/2018/12/selected-questions-answers-from-all.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: